logo
Arbitrum Logo

$?

Delegate

Request Features

paulofonseca.eth

0xe594...2e04

Active

Total Voting Power

97,660

Delegate Address

12

Non-Conformity Ratio

51.52%

Forum Score

-

Social media

92

Total Proposal

96.74%

Participation Rate

1

Recent onchain Vote

Recent offchain Vote

89

Voted

3

Not Voted

All Proposals

Active

Extend AGV Council Term and Align Future Elections with Operational Cadence

Status Icon

Offchain

For

61.26%

Against

0.2%

Abstain

38.54%

Voted

not vote

Voted

not vote

Win

0%

Other

100%

Voted

not vote

Voted

not vote

Active

[Constitutional] AIP: Constitutional Quorum Threshold Reduction

Voted on Jun 26th 2025

Status Icon

Onchain

For

96.1%

Against

2.9%

Abstain

0.99%

Voted

against • 96.86k

Voted

against • 96.86k

this increases the chances of a governance attack on our network. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-constitutional-quorum-threshold-reduction/29145/89?u=paulofonseca

For

99.89%

Against

0.01%

Abstain

0.09%

Voted

for • 96.86k

Voted

for • 96.86k

this will bring much more liquidity into Arbitrum https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-proposal-for-arbitrum-dao-to-register-the-sky-custom-gateway-contracts-in-the-router/28617/91?u=paulofonseca

Succeeded

For

91.42%

Against

0.02%

Abstain

8.57%

Voted

for • 96.86k

Voted

for • 96.86k

it doesn't make sense to continue to subsidize or even maintain Arbitrum Nova. We should focus only on Arbitrum One, aka, Arbitrum. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-remove-cost-cap-on-arbitrum-nova/29332/33?u=paulofonseca

Succeeded

For

91.42%

Against

0.01%

Abstain

8.57%

Voted

for • 96.86k

Voted

for • 96.86k

this will bring more accountability and less overhead. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-treasury-management-council-consolidating-efforts/29334/40?u=paulofonseca

Failed

For

21.91%

Against

50.3%

Abstain

27.79%

Voted

abstain • 96.86k

Voted

abstain • 96.86k

thank you for voting!

Succeeded

For

84.98%

Against

2.24%

Abstain

12.78%

Voted

against • 96.86k

Voted

against • 96.86k

this is a clear power overreach that the DAO should not tolerate. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/updating-the-opco-foundation-s-operational-capability/29388/23?u=paulofonseca

For

0.01%

Against

99.99%

Abstain

0%

Voted

against • 96.86k

Voted

against • 96.86k

for some weird strange reason, we still don't have the cancellable onchain proposals that Tally promised us more than one year ago, here at Arbitrum DAO, and all delegates still need to coordinate and vote against in an onchain proposal every time there is an onchain proposal that was published with errors in its payload. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-proposal-for-arbitrum-dao-to-register-the-sky-custom-gateway-contracts-in-the-router/28617/90?u=paulofonseca

For

84.24%

Against

3.62%

Abstain

12.13%

Voted

not vote

Voted

not vote

CuriaLab.Governance Dashboard

Curia Lab develops and refines data-driven tools for DAO governance by actively participating as a delegate, addressing data transparency, delegate clarity, and risk assessment in governance processes.

Request

Documentation