logo
Arbitrum Logo

$?

Delegate

Request Features

backbone-build.eth

0x3d73...6de0

Inactive

Total Voting Power

57,717

Delegate Address

4

Non-Conformity Ratio

22.22%

Forum Score

-

Social media

12

Total Proposal

75.00%

Participation Rate

1

Recent onchain Vote

Recent offchain Vote

9

Voted

3

Not Voted

All Proposals

Active

TMC Recommendation

Status Icon

Offchain

Win

52.66%

Other

47.34%

Voted

not vote

Voted

not vote

Succeeded

Arbitrum Audit Program

Voted on Feb 26th 2025

Status Icon

Offchain

For

54.64%

Against

4.31%

Abstain

41.05%

Voted

abstain • 40.14k

Voted

abstain • 40.14k

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-audit-program/28368/61?u=tamara

Succeeded

[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto

Voted on Feb 26th 2025

Status Icon

Offchain

For

86.08%

Against

0.01%

Abstain

13.91%

Voted

for • 40.14k

Voted

for • 40.14k

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-arbos-version-40-callisto/28436/27?u=tamara

Succeeded

# Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget

Voted on Feb 25th 2025

Status Icon

Onchain

For

85.41%

Against

2.66%

Abstain

11.93%

Voted

for • 40.14k

Voted

for • 40.14k

As already voted FOR on snapshot proposal with rationale here https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-to-increase-the-stylus-sprint-committee-s-budget/28312/59?u=tamara

Failed

Arbitrum Growth Circles Event Proposal

Voted on Feb 17th 2025

Status Icon

Offchain

For

5.72%

Against

79.12%

Abstain

15.17%

Voted

against • 40.14k

Voted

against • 40.14k

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-growth-circles-event-proposal/28375/29?u=tamara

Succeeded

For

96.01%

Against

3.78%

Abstain

0.22%

Voted

for • 40.14k

Voted

for • 40.14k

Found the summary document very helpful to make a decision. While I obviously do not have the technical depth to evaluate each team’s solution I - believe it is key for the DAO to foster Stylus’ adoption - trust that Entropy has the depth to make an informed decision about what additional application to fund (I would have been very sceptic had we been proposed to fund all 147 applications, but in this case we fund ~18% of applicants which imo is a decent acceptance rate

For

70.68%

Against

10.96%

Abstain

18.35%

Voted

abstain • 40.14k

Voted

abstain • 40.14k

Abstaining because I came too late to the DAO to give proper feedback earlier. Based on what I was able to research the program has been successful in Season 1, with Season 2 still tbd. In my opinion we should focus on doubling down on Season 2 participants and hand hold them a bit further. Having coached Start-Ups on behalf of incubators I wonder if we are doing any of it? The program talks about monitoring projects, but wouldn’t it be smarter to coach them in domains we as DAO are good at/can help them a hand to be successful? An Example is Lido Alliance but any Web2 Accelerator Program is doing it at some level i.e., giving money + expertise to make sure the money is “well invested”. On the other hand I have faith in Jojo and the team to do what is best for the ecosystem. Hence I abstain.

Succeeded

Approve the Nova Fee Sweep Action

Voted on Jan 31st 2025

Status Icon

Offchain

For

99.99%

Against

0%

Abstain

0.01%

Voted

for • 13.62k

Voted

for • 13.62k

Succeeded

For

93.24%

Against

3.83%

Abstain

2.92%

Voted

for • 13.62k

Voted

for • 13.62k

Succeeded

For

56.35%

Against

35.16%

Abstain

8.49%

Voted

for • 13.62k

Voted

for • 13.62k

I am voting in favor of OpCo. It is not the perfect solution but currently the DAO is the opposite of a well-oiled machine which is what we need to stay competitive. Other DAOs with full-time employees can execute faster, lose less time (and money) in the process, and rally behind a mission quicker.

CuriaLab.Governance Dashboard

Curia Lab develops and refines data-driven tools for DAO governance by actively participating as a delegate, addressing data transparency, delegate clarity, and risk assessment in governance processes.

Request

Documentation