I like rubber stamping things that didn’t actually need to happen and contribute to achieving an imaginary quorum of 130,752,756.914717982009274266 ARB as of the ETH block 22375793 at the timestamp of the start of this offchain vote. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-consitutional-top-up-for-hackathon-continuation-program/29064/48?u=paulofonseca

I like rubber stamping things that were already decided and contribute to achieving an imaginary quorum of 130,752,756.914717982009274266 ARB as of the ETH block 22375620 at the timestamp of the start of this offchain vote. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-2-committee-preferred-allocations/29086/21?u=paulofonseca

if we don't deploy, we are just going to hold 10M ARB and do nothing with it and wait... so in mind mind, we might as well just deploy it and trust the partners to return a yield to the DAO. The selected partners are competent, and I think they have the opportunity to do a good job for Arbitrum DAO. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tmc-proposed-allocations-v2-arb-strategy/28785/22?u=paulofonseca

despite not being a good time to sell even more ARB, we should have, as a DAO, a stablecoin strategy that generates yield. Also, the selected partners are competent and experienced. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tmc-proposed-allocations-v2-stablecoin-strategy/28786/26?u=paulofonseca

I think this proposal, in it's current form, is safe to try. @kamilgorski has been super responsive here on the forum, showing up on calls, timing the move of the proposal to a vote to cater to the DAO, incorporating almost all feedback on the proposal, honestly doing everything correctly, from my point of view, including being super detailed about the costs, etc... so I still don't understand why this proposal is being voted down by the DAO at this offchain temperature check stage. I think this is safe to try, and we need a user acquisition program for the dApps and protocols in Arbitrum so it might as well be this one from the Patterns team. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arb-incentives-user-acquisition-for-dapps-protocols/28291/103?u=paulofonseca

this will help bring more liquidity into Arbitrum. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-proposal-for-arbitrum-dao-to-register-the-sky-custom-gateway-contracts-in-the-router/28617/61?u=paulofonseca

we should at least do something with this money. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/57?u=paulofonseca

I don't agree with internalizing this program into the Arbitrum Foundation. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-audit-program/28368/107?u=paulofonseca

despite feeling the protocols should also pay for this program, not just the DAO, right now we don't have any onboarding effort in Arbitrum DAO and we should. So, this feels worthy to try it out. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546/151?u=paulofonseca